USPTO serial 76498997
YARD BASICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YARD BASICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Hollander, , Paul E. Thomas, , and Gail I. Nevius Abbas,
SUSAN E. HOLLANDER, , PAUL E. THOMAS MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP1001 PAGE MILL ROAD, BUILDING 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OMS INVESTMENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OMS INVESTMENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named YARD BASICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |