USPTO serial 76499448
CIII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Success, NY
Lake Success, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Cox
William H. Cox JANVEY, GORDON, HERLANDS, RANDOLPH355 LEXINGTON AVENUE10th FlorNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toilet soap, bath salts, bubble bath, perfume, toilet water, cologne, lipsticks, nail polishes, make-up creams, cleansing milk, body and face powders, skin cleansing lotions and creams, eye-liner, after shave lotion, shaving soap, personal deodorants, hair lotions and talcum powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |