USPTO serial 76503937
BEAUTYRX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAUTYRX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly G. Russell
KIMBERLY G RUSSELL BARE ESCENTUALS INC22ND FL71 STEVENSON STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic skin creams, lotions and gels, namely cosmetic skin lotions, facial lotion, cosmetic skin gels, shower gel, hair gel, age-retardant gel, and eye gel; perfumes, essential oils used as cosmetics, body lotions, body creams and body gels, bath lotions, hair shampoos and hair conditioners, colognes and toilet waters, and cosmetic powders for the skin and eyes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |