USPTO serial 76511361
ENGINEERED PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENGINEERED PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES STONE CRAVEN
JAMES STONE CRAVEN CRAVEN & REID, LLC12 E STONE AVEGREENVILLE, SC 29609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | storage and materials handling systems, namely, metal racks, metal pallets, converyors and converyor controls sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1955 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |