USPTO serial 76511610
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S-223 70 Lund, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Tarolli
THOMAS L TAROLLI TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO LLP526 SUPERIOR AVE STE 1111CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Injectable bone substitute material; namely, injectable bone substitute material comprising synthetically produced ceramics for treatment of osteoporoticfractures by providing a framework for bone producing cells to grow on and to attach produced bone materials and proteins on; products for tissue generation used in conjunction with injectable bone substitute material, comprising living tissue, cells and molecules produced in vitro for promoting healing and growth of injured or degraded body parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Equipment for preparing of injectable bone substitute material and equipment for injecting injectable bone substitute material | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and providing training regarding equipment and services in connection with injectable bone substitute material | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design, design and development of computer hardware and software and legal services, all in connection with injectable bone substitute material, injecting bone substitute material, preparing bone substitute material and equipment therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services in connection with injectable bone substitute material,namely injecting bone substitute material, preparing bone substitute material and equipment therefor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |