USPTO serial 76515183
BLUE RIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE RIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Pappas
GEORGE PAPPAS PAPPAS LAW OFFICESHARRISON PL STE 300919 S HARRISON STFT WAYNE, IN 46802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic and toilet preparations and personal care products, namely, perfume, perfume essence, cologne, eau de toilette, aftershave, shower gel, bath crystals, body lotion, soap for hands and body, and massage oil | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |