USPTO serial 76519127
MATERY VOLK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MATERY VOLK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
MD-3300 TIRSAPOL, MD
Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
MD-3300 TIRSAPOL, MD
Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
MD-3300 TIRSAPOL, MD
Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
TORGOVY DOM "AROMA" TA TRADE HOUSE "AROMA"
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by TORGOVY DOM "AROMA" TA TRADE HOUSE "AROMA"
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY BRANDY, CHAMPAGNE, VODKA, AND WINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
- Other trademarks owned by TORGOVY DOM "AROMA" TA TRADE HOUSE "AROMA"
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MATERY VOLK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |