USPTO serial 76519127
MATERY VOLK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MATERY VOLK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
MD-3300 TIRSAPOL, MD
Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
MD-3300 TIRSAPOL, MD
Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
MD-3300 TIRSAPOL, MD
Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
TORGOVY DOM "AROMA" TA TRADE HOUSE "AROMA"
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by TORGOVY DOM "AROMA" TA TRADE HOUSE "AROMA"
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Tener, Esq.
David M. Tener, Esq. CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD.12TH FLOOR, SEVEN PENN CENTER1635 MARKET STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY BRANDY, CHAMPAGNE, VODKA, AND WINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT"
- Other trademarks owned by TORGOVY DOM "AROMA" TA TRADE HOUSE "AROMA"
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MATERY VOLK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |