USPTO serial 76519173
UNLEASHED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNLEASHED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Rigby, Jr.
ROBERT E RIGBY JR LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT E RIGBY JRPMB 28639 DODGE STBEVERLY, MA 01915Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Dog Boarding Services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |