USPTO serial 76519868
WOW!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WOW!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, CA
Cherry Hill, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas A. Rettew
Douglas A. Rettew Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING SERVICES; BANKING SERVICES PROVIDED VIA THE INTERNET; INVESTMENT BROKERAGE SERVICES; INVESTMENT BROKERAGE SERVICES PROVIDED VIA THE INTERNET; INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES; INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES PROVIDED VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
- Other trademarks owned by TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
- Other trademarks owned by TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
- Other trademarks owned by Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named WOW!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |