Drawing for KEIKO

USPTO serial 76520604

KEIKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KEIKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald L. Dennison

Donald L. Dennison Dennison Schultz Dougherty & MacDonald1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314-2700

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Sleeping bags for children for use in prams and baby carriages; mattresses, and pillowsABANDONED—
024Quilts; quilt covers; bed sheets and pillowcasesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 29, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 29, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 29, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 9, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance