USPTO serial 76520619
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING; FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION, FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSE, FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF RATES OF EXCHANGE, FINANCIAL EXCHANGE, FINANCIAL FORECASTING, FINANCIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS, FINANCIAL INVESTMENT IN THE FIELD OF REAL ESTATE, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL PLANNING AND FINANCIAL RESEARCH; MONETARY EXCHANGE, SECURITIES BROKERAGE; FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY AND FINANCIAL EVALUATION; CAPITAL INVESTMENT CONSULTATION; ESTABLISHING MUTUAL FUNDS FOR OTHERS, MUTUAL FUNDS BROKERAGE, MUTUAL FUNDS DISTRIBUTION, MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT; FINANCIAL INVESTMENT IN THE FIELD OF SECURITIES AND FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF AN INVESTMENT SECURITY; BANKING CONSULTATION, REAL ESTATE CONSULTATION; MONEY TRANSMISSION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER; ON-LINE BANKING SERVICES AND TELEPHONE BANKING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTATION; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CELLULAR TELEPHONE AND WIRELESS DIGITAL MESSAGING SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING FACSIMILES OVER THE TELEPHONE; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, INTERNET INTERCEPTING AND PREVENTING UNSOLICITED CALLS FROM TELEMARKETERS; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CABLE, CABLE RADIO AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH ELECTRONIC AND SATELLITE DELIVERED SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA VIA THE INTERNET, SATELLITE AND TELEPHONE FOR OTHERS; COMMUNICATIONS BY COMPUTER TERMINALS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; DATA SECURE TRANSMISSION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA FEATURING ENCRYPTION; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES; PROVIDING OFF-LINE OR ON-LINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS DISCUSSING FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS, FINANCIAL RESEARCH OR FINANCIAL NEWS; DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS AMONG USERS OF COMPUTERS; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | NEWS AGENCIES, NAMELY, GATHERING AND DISSEMINATION OF NEWS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |