USPTO serial 76520767
HEVELIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3209876Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2007
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEVELIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
80-299 Gdansk, PL
80-299 Gdansk, PL
PL-80-341 GDANSK, PL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jan Tamulewicz
JAN TAMULEWICZ KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP575 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely candies, bakery goods, sweets, namely nougats, fruit cakes, muffins, biscuits, doughnuts, cookies, breads, bread rolls, cakes, pies, tortes; chocolate and chocolate based products, namely milk chocolate, almond chocolate and peanut chocolate, chocolate for use in molding, coating, dipping, and glazing, hot chocolate, chocolate powder, chocolate-based filling for cakes and pies; flavored and sweetened gelatins, namely, fruit gelatins, macedoine, and gelatin candies in chocolate; honey-based products, namely honey buns, honey cakes, honey candies and lollipops; cocoa, coffee; cocoa and coffee-based cakes; tortes, candies and cookies Confectionery, namely candy; bakery goods, sweets, namely nougats; chocolate and chocolate based products, namely milk chocolate, almond chocolate and peanut chocolate, chocolate for use in molding, coating, dipping, and glazing, hot chocolate, chocolate powder, chocolate-based filling for cakes and pies; flavored and sweetened gelatins, cocoa, coffee, honey-based products, namely honey buns, honey cakes, honey candies and lollipops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely vodkas, wines, liqueurs; alcoholic honey-based beverages, namely mead, liqueurs, flavored brandies; fruits in alcohol | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAXUM, Jacek Kwapisz
- Other trademarks owned by MAXUM, Jacek Kwapisz
- Other trademarks owned by OLECH, MARIUS
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named HEVELIUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |