Drawing for FREESTYLE FLYER

USPTO serial 76520976

FREESTYLE FLYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREESTYLE FLYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER, PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028games, namely, a disc to toss and catch and observe in flightACTIVEAug 25, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 27, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 14, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 7, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance