USPTO serial 76521122
BETTER CHOICE MOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTER CHOICE MOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; personal care products namely, deodorants and deodorant antiperspirants, soaps, body milks, hair gels, hair styling gels, hair sprays, hair detangler, hair shampoos and conditioners, skin creams; body scrub, bubble bath, cologne, cream for the body, cream for the hands, exfoliators for the skin, face scrub, fragrant body splash, fragrant body mist, hair styling mousse, lotion for the body, powder for the body, shower gel, soap for the body, soap for the face, and soap for the hands; cleaning preparations for general household use;detergent soap; polishing and scouring preparations; perfumes; nonmedicated toiletries | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed products, namely, newspapers, journals, brochures, magazines, books and periodicals all containing information of general interest to parents; writing implements; photographs; stationery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely jackets, sweaters, vests, sweat shirts, sweat pants, shirts, blouses, t-shirts, pants, jeans, shorts, skirts, dresses, swimwear, cover-ups, headwear, and footwear, diaper cover ups, pajamas, sleepwear, socks, baby booties, gloves, mittens, coats, overalls, infant and toddler one piece clothing, scarves, ear muffs, hand muffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and toys, namely, parlour games; board games; electronic chess games; puzzles; checkers; dominoes; chess games; mahjong; building blocks; playing balls; mobiles, namely toy mobiles, crib mobiles and mobiles for children; gymnastic items, namely, gymnastic apparatus, namely, gymnastic training stools, gymnastic horizontal bars, gymnastic parallel bars and gymnastic vaulting horses; sporting goods, namely, basketballs, baseballs, volleyballs, tennis balls, soccer balls, golf balls, table tennis balls, handballs, billiard balls, hockey pucks, hockey sticks, hockey gloves, table tennis rackets, tennis rackets, golf clubs, fencing swords, fencing gloves, fencing face masks, martial arts weapons, martial arts gloves, martial arts face masks, martial arts shin protectors, boxing gloves, archery bows and archery equipment, namely, archery arrows, archery bow strings, skis, in-line skates, in-line skating gloves, in-line skating shin protectors, in-line skating elbow protectors, surf boards, skateboards, skate boarding gloves, skate boarding shin protectors and skate boarding elbow protectors; Christmas tree decorations; handheld units for playing video games and stand alone video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sirius Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sirius Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BETTER CHOICE MOM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |