USPTO serial 76521177
URISYS 2100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URISYS 2100?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
68305 Mannheim, DE
68305 Mannheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon Medzhibovsky
LEON MEDZHIBOVSKY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 5TH AVE FL 30NEW YORK, NY 10103-3198UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Control solutions and calibration strips for use with scientific and diagnostic apparatus and instruments for quality control and calibration purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer hardware for transmitting, processing and analyzing medical data not used for a diagnostic or treatment function in immediate connection with a person or animal; computer software programs for medical purposes, namely for use in operating a diagnostic apparatus for analyzing in-vitro diagnostic tests | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical instruments and apparatus, namely urinanalysis diagnostic apparatus for analyzing and evaluating in-vitro diagnostic tests; medical apparatus for the detection of substances in urine; dispensers for the distribution and selection of reagents and selection of reagent carriers for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roche Diagnostics GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Roche Diagnostics GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named URISYS 2100
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |