USPTO serial 76521707
TUBTRUGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2010
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TUBTRUGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Barwell,Leicestershire, GB
BARWELL, LEICESTERSHIRE, GB
Warwickshire, CV11 6RX, GB
Warwickshire, CV11 6RX, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Non-disposable, flexible plastic bags for building, household, do-it-yourself, catering, domestic and kitchen use; non-disposable, flexible plastic carrying bags for building, household, do-it-yourself, catering, domestic and kitchen use ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | [ Tool carrier bags sold empty ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Non-metal containers for sweeping, carrying, pouring, scooping, mixing and storing, namely, portable water carriers made of plastic; non-metal tool storage containers; non-metallic bins in the nature of skips; non-metal manure baskets; beds for pets; non-metal containers for use in building or farming, namely, buckets, bowls, and baskets; containers made of plastic materials for use in building or farming, namely, buckets, bowls, and baskets; non-metal containers and collectors for building, or farming refuse; non-metal containers for use as scoops and pourers for building, or farming purposes; non-metal tubs for building or farming use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Garden, household, domestic and kitchen containers made of plastic material, namely, containers for plants; non-metal waste buckets for building, farming or do-it-yourself use; non-metal containers for carrying coal for use in domestic fires; non-metal containers for liquids for household use; non-metal containers for mixing purposes for household use; non-metal containers for storing, handling, carrying and transporting articles and materials for household use; non-metal buckets, bowls and baskets for garden, household, catering, domestic, and kitchen use; non-metal litter baskets and waste buckets for garden, household, catering, domestic and kitchen use; non-metal feeding troughs for animals and drinking troughs for animals; non-metal containers for household use for sweeping, carrying, pouring, scooping, mixing and storing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Faulks & Co. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by FAULKS & COX LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Faulks & Co. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Faulks & Co. Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TUBTRUGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 18, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |