Drawing for CONCEPT PAINTS

USPTO serial 76521907

CONCEPT PAINTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCEPT PAINTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002AUTOMOTIVE AND INDUSTRIAL PAINTS, VARNISHES, LACQUERS, RUST CONDITIONERS, COLOURANTS NAMELY TINTERS, MORDANTS NAMELY CLEANSING SOLUTIONS AND RESINS (BEING RAW NATURAL RESINS); METALS USED IN FOIL AND POWDER FORM FOR AUTOMOTIVE AND INDUSTRIAL PAINTINGACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 18, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 28, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 21, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 21, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 19, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 2, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance