USPTO serial 76521935
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent L. Ramik
VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER, RAMIK & WIGHT7345 MCWHORTER PL STE 101ANNANDALE, VA 22003-5647UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL COOKING OVEN DOORS; OVEN PANELS AND DOOR PANELS FOR DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL OVENS, MICROWAVE OVENS AND RANGES; COOKTOPS AND HOB TOPS; REFRIGERATOR DOORS, DRAWERS, PANELS, HANDLES AND SHELVES, ALL FOR DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATORS; REFRIGERATED MERCHANDISE DISPLAY CASES AND DOORS SOLD AS COMPONENTS THEREOF; SINKS; SHOWER DOORS; SHOWER ENCLOSURES; ELECTRIC TOWEL WARMERS; AND TOILET SEATS AND LIDS, ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS HAVING ANTIMICROBIAL-COATED GLASS OR IMITATION GLASS PANELS AS A COMPONENT PART THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | DOORS AND SHELVES FOR FURNITURE, NAMELY FOR BATHROOM CABINETS, KITCHEN AND DINING ROOM CABINETS, AND TELEVISION, SOUND SYSTEM, STEREO, DVD, AND VIDEO AND AUDIOCASSETTE CABINETS, ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS HAVING ANTIMICROBIAL-COATED GLASS OR IMITATION GLASS PANELS AS A COMPONENT PART THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | CUTTING BOARDS; CHEESE SERVING TRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; SERVING TRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; TRIVETS; COASTERS NOT OF PAPER AND NOT BEING TABLE LINENS; NAPKIN HOLDERS AND FACIAL TISSUE HOLDERS; BREAD BOXES; KNIFE BLOCKS; PIZZA BOARDS; CAKE BOARDS; PASTRY BOARDS; BASKETS FOR FRUIT AND GLASS FRUIT BOWLS AND GLASS TOWEL BARS; AND COVERS IN THE NATURE OF RANGE AND RANGE BURNER COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |