Drawing for JUNE

USPTO serial 76522173

JUNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine M. Baker

CHRISTINE M BAKER ESQ MINTZ, LEVIN COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY ET AL666 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10028UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care products, namely, shampoos and conditioners; skin-care products, namely, cleansers, scrubs, tonics, masques, peels, moisturizers and hydrators, creams, gels, sun tanning and sun care preparations, lighteners, brighteners, lotions and make-up removersACTIVE—
005Acne treatment preparations, anti-inflammatory creams, facial masques for acne treatment and facial peels for acne treatmentACTIVE—
016Brochures featuring information on skin and hair care preparations and beauty products; paper boxes, pens, and paper and vinyl shopping bagsACTIVE—
018Handbags, tote bags, travel bags, cosmetic and toiletry cases sold emptyACTIVE—
020Floor display units, namely, point of purchase displays; display racks for merchandising productsACTIVE—
035Retail store services, namely, on-line retail store services and mail order and mail order catalog services featuring skin and hair care preparationsACTIVE—
044Beauty salon and health and beauty spa servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 7, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance