Drawing for CABLETRIM

USPTO serial 76522619

CABLETRIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CABLETRIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary J. Gaskin

MARY J GASKIN ANNELIN & GASKIN2170 BUCKTHORNE PL STE 220THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019wood moldingsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 21, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 18, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 18, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 13, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 13, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 15, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 10, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Mar 10, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 28, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 28, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 25, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance