Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76522649?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76522649. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FOOTHUGGERS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76522649, the listed owner(s) include: EVERYDAY GAITERS COMPANY, Everyday Gaiters Company.

What is USPTO serial number 76522649?

Serial number 76522649 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FOOTHUGGERS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover FOOTHUGGERS?

The public record lists International Classes: 025. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9

433 reviews Get Help

4.9

USPTO serial 76522649

FOOTHUGGERS

Q: What is the current status of FOOTHUGGERS?

FOOTHUGGERS (76522649) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Jun 9, 2003
Status date: Jan 8, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOTHUGGERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

EVERYDAY GAITERS COMPANY
MINNETONKA, MN
Other trademarks owned by EVERYDAY GAITERS COMPANY
Everyday Gaiters Company
Minnetonka, MN
Other trademarks owned by Everyday Gaiters Company

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
025	Socks	ACTIVE	Sep 15, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jan 8, 2010	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Nov 23, 2009	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Nov 16, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 16, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 28, 2008	DMCC	DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED	—
Jan 11, 2008	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Jan 10, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 7, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 7, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2008	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Dec 18, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 4, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 4, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Apr 10, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Oct 11, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 20, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 20, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 12, 2006	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Mar 17, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2005	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jul 27, 2005	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jan 27, 2005	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jul 22, 2004	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Jul 2, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 2, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 2, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2003	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—