USPTO serial 76522913
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Merovitch
ALAN MEROVITCH LAW OFFICE OF ALAN MEROVITCH153 STEVENS AVEMOUNT VERNON, NY 10550UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Key Cases, Suit Bags, Dress Bags, Shoe Bags for Travel, Garment Bags, Cosmetic Bags sold Empty, Handbags, Luggage, Diaper Bags, Umbrellas, Purses, Wallets, Billfolds, Change Purses, Tote Bags, School Bags, Beach Bags, Shopping Bags, Briefcases, Briefcase Type Portfolios, Attache Cases, Pencil Cases, Insulated Bags, Back Packs, All Purpose Sport Bags, Artist Briefcase Type Portfolios, Travel Bags, Non-Motorized Collapsible Luggage Carts, Clutch Bags, Shoulder Bags, Beauty Cases, Carry on Bags, Fanny Packs, Lunch Bags | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |