USPTO serial 76522942
ROLLUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ROLLUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOLBROOK, NY
HOLBROOK, NY
HOLBROOK, NY
ROLLUP SHUTTERS AND AWNINGS, INC.
Holbrook, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | LATERALLY RETRACTABLE NON-METAL AWNINGS AND AWNING SYSTEMS COMPRISING AWNING HOUSING, SUPPORT FRAMES, SHOCK ABSORBING BARS, WIPER BARS AND HARDWARE, * EXCLUDING ANY AWNING OR AWNING SYSTEM THAT USES A LATERALLY MOVING ROLLER TUBE, TRANSLATING PERPENDICULAR TO THE AXIS OF ROTATION, TO SUPPORT THE EXTENDED END OF THE FABRIC *; OUTDOOR FABRIC CANOPY SYSTEMS COMPRISING HOUSINGS, SUPPORT FRAMES, SHOCK ABSORBER BARS, WIPER BARS AND HARDWARE, * EXCLUDING ANY CANOPY SYSTEM THAT USES A LATERALLY MOVING ROLLER TUBE, TRANSLATING PERPENDICULAR TO AXIS OF ROTATION, TO SUPPORT THE EXTENDED END OF THE FABRIC * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRAUN, MURRY R.
- Other trademarks owned by MEHY HOLDINGS
- Other trademarks owned by MEHY HOLDINGS
- Other trademarks owned by ROLLUP SHUTTERS AND AWNINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named ROLLUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 11, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 11, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |