USPTO serial 76523001
ATMVERIFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3263315Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ATMVERIFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cathedral City, CA
Cathedral City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Dietrich
William H. Dietrich Slater & Matsil, LLP17950 Preston RoadSuite 1000Dallas, TX 75252Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing bank account verification information by means of both private networks leased/dedicated lines and secured public networks, Internet SSL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |