Drawing for INFINITY COLLECTION

USPTO serial 76523027

INFINITY COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFINITY COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. McComas

WILLIAM A MCCASON SHAPIRO SHER GUINOT & SANDLER36 S CHARLES ST STE 2000BALTIMORE, MD 21201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Flooring products, namely, hardwood flooring, laminate wood flooring and floor tileACTIVE—
027Flooring products, namely, carpetingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 28, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 5, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 25, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance