USPTO serial 76523074
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, skin and hair care products, namely, hair styling gels, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair spray, hair emollients, hair lotions, hair dressings for men and other hair care preparations; essential oils for personal use; skin emollients; hand lotions, sun care lotions; skin creams, anti-aging creams, sun creams, eye creams; topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; massage oil; non-medicated lip balm; lip gloss; mascara; skin moisturizers and hydrators; facial cleansers; shower gel; bath oil, baby oil, body oil; foundation makeup; non-medicated skin care preparations; hand soaps, liquid soaps for hands, face and body; medicated soaps; depilatory creams; exfoliants for hair and skin | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | candles; scented candles; vegetable oil for use in the manufacture of soaps | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | medicated skin preparations for use in treating acne, eczema, dry skin, psoriasis and other skin abnormalities; medicated hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Shelled, roasted or otherwise processed nuts; protein based, nutrient-dense snacks bars; infused edible oils, edible oil blends, edible oil sprays; butter substitutes; soups; preparations for making soups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | mayonnaise; salad dressings; marinades; barbecue sauce; sauces; sauces for fish - remoulades; dry cake mixes; mixes for bakery goods; dry cookie mixes; shakes; low carbohydrate protein shakes; all purpose energy shakes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |