USPTO serial 76523198
OENEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OENEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARIS, FR
75008 Paris, FR
PARIS, FR
PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana F. Bigelow
DANA F BIGELOW WALL MARJAMA & BILINSKI LLP101 S SALINA ST 4TH FLSYRACUSE, NY 13202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations used in wine making such as chemicals for clarifying the wine, chemical aromas for wine, chemical stabilizers for wine, chemical additives to improve the quality of the wine, chemical preparations in the nature of bactericides for use in the manufacture of wines | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metal wine storage tanks, barrels of metal, casks of metal, bottle caps of metal, hoops of metal for barrels | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Bottle caps not of metal, bottle sealing caps not of metal, corks for bottles, corks, wood boxes for bottles, bottle racks, hoops not of metal for barrels, casks of wood to decant wine, wine storage tanks not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Finishing of corks, polishing of corks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OENEO
- Other trademarks owned by Sabate Diosos
- Other trademarks owned by OENEO
- Other trademarks owned by OENEO
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named OENEO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |