USPTO serial 76523302
OUTLANDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUTLANDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quebec J0E 2L0, XP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederic Dionne; Jennifer Millson
FREDERIC DIONNE JENNIFER MILLSON BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INCINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTPO BOX 230NORTON, VT 05907-0230Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | VEHICLES, NAMELY, ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; SEMI-FITTED AND FITTED ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |