USPTO serial 76523369
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit pie filling, namely, grape, apple, raspberry, strawberry, elderberry, blueberry, boysenberry, peach, pear, plum and other fruit-based pie filling sold by the applicant at retail directly to the public | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Fruit pies made with pastry, namely, grape, apple, raspberry, strawberry, elderberry, blueberry, boysenberry, peach, pear, plum and other fruit pies made with pastry sold by the applicant at retail directly to the public | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 20, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |