Drawing for DELICIOUS DELIVERIES

USPTO serial 76523927

DELICIOUS DELIVERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELICIOUS DELIVERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara H. Loewenthal

BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Plastic feeding sets namely bowls, sip cups, snack cups, forks and spoonsABANDONED—
024Burp cloths, wash cloths, infant hooded towelsABANDONED—
025Newborn and infant apparel and accessories, namely, creepers, union suits, socks, booties, baby bibs not of paper, t-shirts, capsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 11, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance