USPTO serial 76524476
DERMA RX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DERMA RX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morland C. Fischer
Morland C. Fischer LAW OFFICE OF MORLAND C FISCHER2030 MAIN ST STE 1300IRVINE, CA 92614-7220UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated oils, lotions, creams, gels, solutions and sprays applied to the skin for moisturizing, anti-aging, bleaching, tanning, skin damage repair, sun blocking and wrinkle reducing applications; topical acne, eczema and psoriasis treatments; shampoo; hair conditioner; soap; and cosmetics, namely, nail polish, lipstick, eye shadow, foundation, face powder and perfume | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | transdermal and epidermal antioxidants, oils, lotions, creams, gels, solutions and sprays containing medications to reduce skin erythema and dermatitis and for moisturizing, anti-aging, bleaching, tanning, skin damage repair, sun blocking and wrinkle reducing applications; topical acne, eczema and psoriasis treatments; and shampoo with added dandruff control treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |