Drawing for ULTRAPRIME

USPTO serial 76524900

ULTRAPRIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRAPRIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

Jess M. Collen Practus, LLP100 South Bedford Road, Suite 328Mount Kisco, NY 10549United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Multi-purpose flooring adhesive, ceramic wall tile adhesive, vinyl waterproof floor tile adhesive, synthetic backed carpet adhesive, contact cement, exterior carpet adhesive, exterior tile adhesive, vinyl flooring asbestos adhesive, clear set floor tile adhesive, linoleum flooring paste, asphalt solvent adhesive, asphalt cutback flooring adhesive, rubberized asphalt floor tile adhesive, ceramic floor adhesive, ceramic tile adhesive, quarry tile adhesive, cove base tile adhesive, contact bond cement, floor seaming adhesive, carpet gripper adhesive, hardwood flooring adhesive, carpet latex adhesive, carpet padding adhesive cement, carpet pad adhesive, carpet adhesive, urethane foam backed carpet adhesive, vinyl and urethane floor covering adhesive, wall carpet adhesive, all-weather carpet adhesive, carpet release adhesive, stone flooring/tile adhesive, and glass tile adhesiveACTIVEJan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 8, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 8, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 8, 2005ISSRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 1, 2005RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Apr 1, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 23, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance