USPTO serial 76525071
RENOVIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENOVIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Commercialization for others of therapeutic products for the treatment of pain, nervous system diseases and disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and disorders, degenerative diseases and disorders, neurological diseases and disorders, neuropsychiatric diseases and disorders, psychiatric diseases and disorders, epilepsy, prostate dysfunction, bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, obesity, cancer, and respiratory diseases and disorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Pharmaceutical, medical, scientific, veterinary, agricultural, and product research and development services in the fields of neurological diseases and disorders, psychiatric disorders, the treatment of neurological diseases and disorders, and the treatment of psychiatric disorders; product research and development services, namely development, design and research of therapeutics for the treatment of pain, nervous system diseases and disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and disorders, degenerative diseases and disorders, neurological diseases and disorders, neuropsychiatric diseases and disorders, psychiatric diseases and disorders, epilepsy, prostate dysfunction, bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, obesity, cancer, and respiratory diseases and disorders; Pharmaceutical, medical, scientific, veterinary, agricultural, and product research and development services for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |