USPTO serial 76525323
THE ONLY RETURN IS BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ONLY RETURN IS BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Semi-precious and precious gems; gold, platinum and silver; jewelery | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | The operation of a business dealing in the brokerage and sale of semi-precious and precious gems, gold, silver and platinum; mail order services featuring jewellery; computerized on-line ordering services in the field of jewellery; art-line auction services; dissemination of advertising for others via a global communications networking the field of jewellery; the operation of trade shows featuring jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial valuation of jewellery, semi-precious arid precious gemstones; gold, silver and platinum | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom jewellery design; providing online information relating to the mining and exploration of semi-precious and precious gems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARATS INVESTMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DDI DIAMONDS DIRECT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE ONLY RETURN IS BEAUTY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |