USPTO serial 76525413
THE HAVERFORD TRUST COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2945352Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE HAVERFORD TRUST COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Meyer
MarieElena V. Ness Haverford Trust CompanyThree Radnor Corporate CenterSuite 450Radnor, PA 19087Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking, investment and trust company services, investment and portfolio management services, investment consultation and advice, all for individuals, institutions, funds, endowments and foundations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HTC-IP Holding Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by HTC-IP Holding Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by THE HAVERFORD TRUST COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE HAVERFORD TRUST COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |