USPTO serial 76525556
A COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with A COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAINT JOSEPH, MN, US
COLLEGEVILLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
ST. CLOUD, MN, US
Other trademarks owned by COLLEGEVILLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY PROPERTY, LLC
ST. CLOUD, MN, US
Other trademarks owned by COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY PROPERTY, LLC
COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY PROPERTY, LLC
ST. CLOUD, MN, US
Other trademarks owned by COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY PROPERTY, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. JOHN BARTZ
R. JOHN BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ PA6950 FRANCE AVE S STE 119EDINA, MN 55435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | residential and commercial property development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COLLEGEVILLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY PROPERTY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY PROPERTY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named A COLLEGEVILLE COMMUNITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |