CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TOTALTRIP

USPTO serial 76526031

TOTALTRIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTALTRIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda M. Novak

Linda M. Novak FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for spa services, namely, for health and wellness of body and spirit offered at a health resort; travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for spa services, namely, for cosmetic body care services.ABANDONED—
045Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for wedding chapel services.ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 31, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 9, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance