USPTO serial 76526106
DOMINATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOMINATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta T5J 2Z1, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear and headgear for men, women and children, namely, anoraks, athletic shoes, boxer shorts, caps, coats, dresses, ear muffs, gloves, hats, headbands, jackets, jerseys, leg warmers, mittens, pajamas, pants, parkas, sarongs, scarves, shirts, shorts, skirts, slippers, socks, sport shirts, sweaters, sweat pants, sweatshirts, tank tops, tops, T-shirts, vests, warm-up suits and wristbands | ACTIVE | May 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |