USPTO serial 76526692
DON MANGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DON MANGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Don Mango and its logo represents a branded "onepoint- of-sale-consetionary cart" whose full intent of commerce is to sell servings of mango slices in peeled fruit content of various ounces, either in cups or platters to the public Description of the Consetionary-Cart-- The consetionary carts are stationery-mobile-units whose full intent of commerce is to serve as a "one-point-of-sale" to the public The stationery-mobile-unit-carts are built of polyester Orthoftalic wax reinforzed with fiberglass roving style applied with an aspersion system, gelcoated with an Isoftalic UV protected The cart has a fruit slicer on the top which peals 5x5 mango slices and bidoors with content holders on the doors Description of the Product-- The fruit content is mango in slices of 5*5 mm of radius adding salt, lemon, pepper, cinnamon, mora/mile, creme of milk, honey, sauce, of chile or "confetti" and vinger served either in disposable cups or platters of 8 ounces | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |