USPTO serial 76526786
AW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter N. Lalos
PETER N LALOS STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Attachments for vehicles, namely, buckets, dozer blades, rakes, forks, grapples, slopers, thumbs, graders, boom arm extensions and coupler systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services in the field of attachments for vehicles, namely, buckets, dozer blades, rakes, forks, grapples, slopers, thumbs, graders, boom arm extensions and coupler systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |