Drawing for CASINO ONE!

USPTO serial 76526803

CASINO ONE!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASINO ONE!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Casino servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Oct 10, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Oct 3, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 31, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 31, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 16, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 16, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 12, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 12, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 27, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 30, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance