USPTO serial 76526846
SEE THE UNSEEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3204274Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2007
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEE THE UNSEEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Waltham, MA
Waltham, MA
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NEW YORK, NY
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NEW YORK, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Infrared electronics, namely thermal imaging systems, devices and components comprised primarily of one or more of the following-- infrared cameras; thermal imaging camera cores; thermal imaging camera engines; thermal imaging camera housings; interface control units and assemblies; optical lenses and assemblies; sensors; custom integrated circuits; pan and tilt positioning assemblies; digital signal processing assemblies; protective infrared windows and assemblies; infrared detectors; image processing units; electronic control units; thermal image processing software, graphical user interface control software, and software for analysis of specific applications, digital video interfacing and video recording in thermal imaging applications; video, LCD, head-up and CRT displays; power sources; and electronic accessories therefore in the nature of batteries, battery chargers, and interface cable assemblies; and manuals therefor, sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Raytheon Company
- Other trademarks owned by Raytheon Company
- Other trademarks owned by L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SEE THE UNSEEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |