USPTO serial 76527170
LACOPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LACOPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boucherville, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Sports shoes, namely, soccer shoes, tennis shoes, jogging shoes, running shoes, football shoes, baseball shoes, walking shoes and volleyball shoes; sport apparel and accessories, namely, t-shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, socks, gloves, caps and hats | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Soccer and volleyball knee, shin and elbow pads; tennis rackets; sports balls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |