Drawing for MIRROR MIRROR

USPTO serial 76528004

MIRROR MIRROR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRROR MIRROR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020DOUBLE MIRROR WITH ARM EXTENSIONACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 29, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 31, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 31, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 21, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 21, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Dec 1, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 1, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance