USPTO serial 76528024
MAGIC MOVING & STORAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 2006
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MAGIC MOVING & STORAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MAGIC MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.
Walnut Creek, CA, US
Walnut Creek, CA, US
Walnut Creek, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randall B. Bateman
Randall B. Bateman BATEMAN IPP.O. Box 127Liberty, MO 64069United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Residential and Office Relocation Services, namely packing articles for transportation and transportation of articles via truck, air, boat, or rail; Warehouse storage | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 9, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |