USPTO serial 76528375
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing namely, shirts, underskirts, corselettes, pajamas, nightgowns, brassieres, tights, bath robes, camisoles, unitard, underwear, girdles, pads for brassieres made of cloth, baby pants, swimsuits, swim trunks, shoes, footwear, sports shoes, headwear, hosiery, gloves, neckties, suspenders for clothing, swim caps, wedding dresses, belts, and shawls | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |