Drawing for CHEF WOO

USPTO serial 76528463

CHEF WOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3190420Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CHEF WOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles N. Quinn

CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP2000 MARKET ST 10TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products, namely soupsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
030Food products, namely spices and noodlesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 3, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 16, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 200444EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED—
Aug 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance