USPTO serial 76532022
CSM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CSM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Netherlands, NL
Netherlands, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A LAVINE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLPONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Dough conditioners; fermentation extracts; food preservative compositions for use in bread, bread related products and pastries; fatty and non-fatty acids for use in pasta; emulsifiers for use in the manufacture of food products; emulsifying agents for use in the manufacture of baked foods; stabilizers for pastry dough; albumen for use in the manufacture of food products | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Food for medically restricted diets; dietary drinks for use as meal replacements; vitamins and minerals for use as a food additive; lacteal flour for use as a baby food | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Milk; edible oils and edible fats; margarine; emulsifying agents for use in the manufacture of baked foods skimmed milk; dried milk; cream; whipped cream; imitation cream; cheese; imitation cheese; cream cheese; vegetable mousse; fish mousse; yogurt; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; potato based snack foods; fruit based snack foods; frozen fruits; frozen vegetables; fruit preserves and jams; dried and preserved fruit for use in the bakery and confectionery trade | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food leavening agents; yeast for fermentation purpose; bread and cake improvers, namely, functional ingredients used in dough for bread and other bakery products to improve flavor, volume, texture and shelf life; food starch; malt for food purposes; flour for use in the manufacture of pastries and breads; dessert mousse; chocolate mousse; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bread, unleavened bread; bread, pastry, and dough mixes; bread rolls and sandwiches; biscuits; pies; pastries and pastry mixes; cakes; cake mixes; buns; croissants, muffins, doughnuts, brownies; edible decorations, icings and glazes for use on cakes, cookies, gingerbread, tarts, biscuits, meringues and mixes for making edible decorations; cookies, gingerbread, tarts, biscuits, meringues; mixes for making cookies, gingerbread, tarts, biscuits and meringues; baking powder; sugar; confectioner sugar; fruit fillings for cakes and pies; bakery desserts; puddings; flan; noodles; molasses for food; golden table syrup; golden pancake syrup; malt extracts used as flavoring; pizzas; coffee; tea; cocoa, honey, treacle, rice, tapioca and sago; fondants; icing and marzipan and corn products, namely, frozen corn | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CSM N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CSM N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CSM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |