USPTO serial 76532271
GINO ROSSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GINO ROSSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
13 Forest DriveWarren, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | WALLETS; VALISES; TRUNKS; TRAVELLING BAGS; SUITCASES; SHOULDER BAGS; COIN PURSES; PORTMANTEAUS; BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS; WHIPS FOR ANIMALS; HANDBAGS; LEATHER SHOPPING BAGS; LEATHER LEASHES AND HARNESSES FOR ANIMALS | ABANDONED | Feb 22, 1994 |
| 025 | LEATHER COATS; FOOTWEAR; LEATHER BELTS; LEATHER CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, VESTS, JACKETS, COATS, PANTS AND CAPS; FUR COATS; FUR JACKETS; FUR BELTS; FUR GLOVES; FUR HATS; CLOTHING MADE OF PLASTIC AND OF NATURAL MATERIALS, NAMELY, SHIRTS, VESTS, JACKETS, COATS, PANTS, VESTS, BELTS AND GLOVES; SHOES, NAMELY, ATHLETIC SHOES, GYMNASTIC SHOES, LEATHER SHOES, SOCCER SHOES, SNEAKERS, BOOTS, SANDALS AND GALOSHES; LEATHER APPAREL, NAMELY, LEATHER TIES, BOW TIES, HATS, GLOVES AND STOLES | ABANDONED | Feb 22, 1994 |
| 026 | HAIR BOWS; HAIR BUCKLES; HAIR ORNAMENTS; SHOE ORNAMENTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; REINS FOR GUIDING CHILDREN; LEATHER LEASHES AND HARNESSES FOR CHILDREN; SHOELACES | ABANDONED | Feb 22, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |