USPTO serial 76533258
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Halsey, Jr.
MICHAEL J BADAGLIACCA STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PASTES AND ADHESIVE FOR STATIONARY AND HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, SEALING WAXES, PRINTERS REGLETS, PRINTING TYPES, DUPLICATING MACHINES FOR PRODUCING PHOTOSTATS AND BLUEPRINTS, ADDRESSING MACHINES, INKING RIBBONS, ELECTRIC STAPLERS, ENVELOPE SEALING MACHINES, DRAWING INSTRUMENTS, TYPEWRITERS, OFFICE CHECK WRITING AND CHECK WRITERS, MIMEOGRAPH DUPLICATING MACHINES, RELIEF DUPLICATING MACHINES, PAPER SHREDDERS, ROTARY DUPLICATING MACHINES, MARK ENGRAVING TEMPLATES, ELECTRIC PENCIL SHARPENERS, DECORATORS' PAINTBRUSHES, DISPOSABLE DIAPERS OF PAPER, FOOD WRAPPING PLASTIC FILM FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, GARBAGE BAGS OF PAPER FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, PRINTED PAPER PATTERNS, TAILORS CHALK, BANNERS OF PAPER, FLAGS OF PAPER, INDOOR AQUARIUMS WITH FITTED COVERS AND HOODS, TOWELS OF PAPER, TABLE NAPKINS OF PAPER, HAND TOWELS OF PAPER; HANDKERCHIEFS OF PAPER, TABLE CLOTHS OF PAPER AND CARDBOARD, STATIONERY, PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION, PAINTINGS, CALLIGRAPHIC PRINTS, PHOTOGRAPHS AND PHOTOGRAPH STANDS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |